Monthly
Statement:
September 2005
Fergus, my 11 year old son, had a homework assignment to create
an array, which he actually interpreted to mean a taxonomy.
He choose to create an array of examples of construction garbage,
which are easy enough to find around our house these days.
I saw the objects glued in a grid to a sheet of paper the
next morning. There is a poetry inherent in taxonomies, which
function as examples of variations on a theme. I1m being a
bit stingy here as I don't know if I can convey the effect
his taxonomy seemed to have- a bit of electrical wire wrapped
tightly in shiny black tape, a fragment of old lathing, the
blank circle knocked out from a metal electrical box, etc.
- arranged in a grid. I had the sense that he tried to make
his examples as varied as possible. He wrote out in large
letters at the bottom: Construction Garbage.
Although I've been interested for many years in taxonomies
of colored objects, with this project, which has required
writing as well as collecting and setting the stuff up for
display, I find myself reflecting much more on what it is
that interests me.
Since I have the sense that a taxonomy of yellow objects can
have the effect of pointing at the pure idea of yellow- just
as Fergus had the effect of pointing at the pure idea of construction
garbage- it occurs to me that there are particular ways in
which I choose the objects to maximize the effect I want.
It occurred to me as I was picking up something yellow- a
fading, scummed up Styrofoam egg carton- on a sidewalk near
our house in Greenpoint, that I have always been attracted
to litter. I could probably write a book about my attraction
to litter. For now, I will only mention two things in connection
with this.
One is that I am a collagist in the Schwitters school and
have always been sensitive to the evocativeness found objects
carry.
The other is that it seems significant to me to consider the
human side of my interest in another way- very little in my
collection will be anything other than something manufactured,
used, and discarded by human beings. Yellow (and every other
color) has been distilled by human beings and pushed in every
way to limits that probably exist without human intervention,
but not in anything like the concentrations you can find them
in discarded litter along any street in Williamsburg. Advertising,
for example, is in a way linked closely to the fact that we
have this sense of the pure idea of this or that or the other.
Colors used on packages are designed to elicit this kind of
response.
As I mentioned in describing Fergus array, the fact that the
items chosen are different, that you emphasize the differentnesses
in creating the collection- well, its also a natural thing
that putting a bunch of things together that share a characteristic
will emphasize their differences. But, I don't keep picking
up the same examples of yellow things (M&M packages, fragments
of plastic caution tape, Vitamin Water bottles/labels) as
redundancy isn't helpful. I love the things best that seem
to show off their uniqueness most- and there is also a way
in which abstraction plays an important role- a circle, for
example, has its own meaning apart from the history of an
object that carries this image, such as in the paper cd sleeve
with a transparent circular center that I picked up near Chase
Bank on Grand St. In fact, the photos may reveal as occurs
to me now as I write, a subset of yellow objects that include
the image of a circle as a prominent feature).
So, I find myself interested in the decisions I make which
affect the effectiveness of the taxonomy. I originally chose
to collect yellow things, knowing that I wouldn't pick up
messy organic stuff, or gloves of any sort, that I would pick
up items that could be hung on a wall for display relatively
easily, etc. Objects within a relatively narrow size range
form a group more readily. (Including a school bus wouldn't
be helpful unless all or most of the objects were of a similar
size to that). And you could define taxonomies that would
presumably be less attractive and effective at conveying the
variations on a theme feeling. (For example, I1m not at all
interested in the possibility of a taxonomy of discarded vitamin
water bottles, which simply wouldn't show enough variation
to become a world. The definition of the taxonomy has to be
open enough. It strikes me that this is probably not literally
true, and there is no clear line that excludes any taxonomy
you could define- I have personal reasons for being attracted
to some ideas over others).
And the rules don't need to be binding- except the one.
Yesterday I saw something bright yellow on a sidewalk near
a fence in the distance, which turned out to be sunlight finding
its way through a chink in the bottom of the fence in the
evening and laying over a small triangle of concrete.
Next month: The Yellow/ Brown Problem and a possible change
of strategy, or at least a problem discovered that requires
a solution.
Process:
I will collect yellow things which will be mostly litter and
other refuse of our urban environment, on walks. I will collect
them as I go about the normal business of my life.
|